Identity Authentication: Are You Willing to Risk Your Reputation on It?
By Andrea Klein, Chief Marketing Officer, IdenTrust, Inc.
A damaged corporate reputation translates into huge economic
losses that span decreased brand value; low share price; lost
customers, partners and strategic relationships and difficulty
recruiting and keeping top-notch employees. Some businesses,
such as Arthur Anderson, never recover. Corporations, and their
financial institutions, need to understand that they can and
must manage reputational risk in much the same way that they
manage other types of risk – through sound strategies, modeling,
business intelligence and technology.
All corporations,
regardless of their size or industry, inherently manage varying
levels of risk. Successful organizations are adept at managing
supply chain, market, legal, operational and financial risk
using various management tools and models. Many organizations,
however, overlook the need to manage reputation risk, which can
prove just as – or even more – costly to rectify if compromised.
Business reputations are vulnerable to unsavory business
practices, discriminatory hiring and identity/data breaches that
weaken customers’ trust in an organization or brand. A damaged
reputation can cost an organization in terms of decreased brand
value; low share price; lost customers, partners and strategic
relationships; and difficulty recruiting and keeping top-notch
employees. Simply put, losing your reputation translates into
huge economic losses. Recovery can take years; some businesses
never recover e.g. Arthur Anderson.
Reputational risk as it pertains to security breaches, whether
from mishandling of sensitive customer information, phishing and
pharming attacks or non-compliance with regulations is a growing
concern for corporate boards and their investors. Corporations,
and their financial institutions, need to understand that they
can and must manage reputational risk in much the same way that
they manage other types of risk – through sound strategies,
modeling, business intelligence and technology.
The Value of Reputation
In a Financial Times article titled “The Challenge of Protecting
Reputation,” Professor Paul A. Argenti of the Tuck School of
Business at Dartmouth College asks, “Why is it so easy for
executives to think about and plan for financial risks, but
still so hard for them to understand that intangible risks to an
organization’s reputation are far more likely to destroy
shareholder value?”
Reputation is all about perception. A reputation is tenuous.
Reputation is also thought to be difficult to quantify. However,
organizations that have seen their good reputations dissolve,
and have worked to repair them, can attest to the high cost of
restoring a reputation…or, at the very least, restoring the
business lost as the result of a single data breach.
The Ponemon Institute, an organization that studies privacy and
information management, recently reported that the cost of
recovering from a single data breach now averages $6.3 million.
That figure represents an increase of 31% since 2006 and a
nearly 90% increase since 2005. Two-thirds of that cost is spent
recovering business that’s lost after a breach, a cost that has
risen 30% since last year. There is no question
that it’s getting more expensive to replace customers lost as a
result of security breaches.
Breaches by third parties-outsourcers – or members of a
company’s supply chain – were the second biggest cause of
security compromises and are more expensive, according to the
report. Companies spent an average of $231 per lost record on
third-party breaches compared to $171 per lost record in 2006.
Tales of the following companies represent nightmare scenarios
that would keep any C-level executive up at night:
-
Retailer TJX Cos. announced that it will spend $256 million
responding to the company’s data breach that compromised up to
100 million accounts. The payments, announced in 2007, include
financial settlements to Visa International Inc., banks and
customers – as well as costs associated with upgrading the
company’s information protection processes and technologies.
- American International Group (AIG) received a backlash from
the financial community amid reports of suspect accounting and
business practices. “AIG, one of the largest insurers in the
world, has been rocked…by multiple investigations into its
accounting. The company’s shares are down more than 16% since it
disclosed inquiries by New York Attorney General Elliot Spitzer
and the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 14,”
Reported CBS MarketWatch on July 8, 2005.
- ChoicePoint, Inc.’s market cap dropped by $720 million
following news that identity thieves had gained access to
personal consumer information. As a result of the security
breach, the identification and credential verification services
provider was ordered to pay a $10 million federal fine,
contribute $5 million to a fund to compensate consumers who
suffered from the breach and submit to external security audits
for 20 years. Analysts estimate that ChoicePoint will spend more
than $30 million in direct costs associated with the security
breach.
- CardSystems Solutions, Inc. was a billion dollar company
before its security breach that compromised 40 million consumer
accounts. After the breach, the company was acquired by Pay By
Touch™ Payment Solutions, LLC. for a fire sale price of $47
million.
Two Strikes and You’re Out…
So just how tenuous is an organization’s reputation? Very
tenuous, particularly in the banking industry.
According to the Ponemon Institute’s 2006 “Privacy Trust Study for Retail
Banking,” banks are only one or two security breaches away from
losing their customers. While 68% of customers give their bank
high marks for protecting their personal information, those
customers report that only two security breaches would destroy
that trust. Thirty-four percent of respondents would transfer
their funds after a single security breach; 45% after two security breaches.
Fifty-eight percent of those consumers surveyed said that a
security breach would decrease their sense of trust and
confidence in the organization reporting the incident. Only
eight percent of respondents did not blame the organization that
reported the breach. Surprisingly, 12% said the incident
enhanced their sense of confidence in the organization.
And if you think the answer to mitigating reputational risk is
to keep mum on minor security breaches, think again. According
to the Ponemon Institute, more than 82% of consumers
believe that an organization should always report a breach, even
if the lost or stolen data was encrypted or there was no
criminal intent.
The Value of Reputation in Financial Services
While reputation is important for all organizations, it is
especially critical for financial institutions. Many financial
institutions, especially smaller banks, are not protecting
against reputational risk because they cannot quantify or
measure the risk. Instead, they focus on familiar risks that are
readily quantifiable and easier to protect against, including
market risk, credit risk, liquidity risk and regulatory risk.
Increased phishing and pharming attacks – as well as
high-profile news stories of security breaches – are having an
impact on how customers interact with their financial
institutions, according to a 2005 Gartner survey of 5,000 U.S.
adults. For example, some online banking customers are changing
their usage patterns, including logging in less frequently and
no longer using online bill payment services.
These trends have serious implications for financial
organizations and other companies that want to use the e-mail
channel to communicate more cost-effectively with their customer
base. For example, a bill sent electronically costs about half
of what a bill costs when sent through the regular mail.
PLOTting an Excellent Reputation
If financial institutions and other types of corporations are
only one or two security breaches away from losing customer
trust, how they can adequately protect their organizations? A
comprehensive approach to IT security is essential – one that
addresses physical security of the data, security of the IT
infrastructures on which the data sits, as well as security of
the data as it flows between systems and organizations.
Corporations and financial institutions have already implemented
numerous security measures to address everything from physical
access to single sign-on and provisioning. They now need to move
their focus to identity authentication – the new front line of
the security battle. To have the flexibility to respond to new
types of fraud and resulting regulations, a comprehensive
approach to identity management needs to incorporate a globally
interoperable solution for trusted electronic payments and other
sensitive communications.
Early market efforts primarily focused on access versus
authentication. Thus, as long as an individual had the
appropriate PIN/password or token to enter, he/she would be
granted access. This approach has proven to be short sighted.
Companies need to understand and vet credentials – understanding
how they were granted – before they can rely upon them.
Solutions that simply authenticate the user to the site, and not
who the user really is –while good first attempts – simply do
not guarantee trust, and only meet basic compliance with Federal
Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC) guidelines
and other regulations. To provide identity security on the
highest level possible, multi-factor authentication is essential
across all levels. Multi-factor authentication uses a single,
comprehensive solution that cross-authenticates the user with
the site, and secures the two through digitally issued
certificates. It is also critical to have validation of
certificates against a real-time updated list that indicates
whether or not the certificate has expired or been revoked. A
Public Key Infrastructure (PKI)-based approach incorporates a
protocol that provides real-time validation of a user’s
certificate status.
A comprehensive system for identity authentication requires
policies, legal infrastructure, operational consistency and
technology (P.L.O.T) for access that users can rely upon. Of
special importance are procedures and guidelines that work
across multiple institutions and geographic borders. For
identity authentication to provide a trusted business
environment, Policies (P) regulating the issuance and handling
of digital identities and the legal (L) framework that accepts
or rejects those identities must be acceptable and enforceable
both domestically and across borders. Otherwise, a corporation
or its financial institution could face the prospect of
adjudicating possible disputes in jurisdictions around the world
should a security breach arise, risking that the contracts being
relied upon are not binding – an expensive and cumbersome
prospect. Additionally, the Operational (O) environment for
controlling the back office support for the digital identities
and the Technology (T) used to enable access to the networks for
validation must also be globally interoperable and consistent.
Corporate executives, learning from the experiences of their
less fortunate peers, are recognizing the true cost of a
tarnished reputation. The next and more challenging step for
many is mitigating reputational risk, especially as it relates
to online fraud and data breaches. The good news for the
corporations and their banking partners is that they have many
tools at their disposal to affect positive change. Just as in
operational risk management, however, the key to success is an
enterprise-wide, standards-based and standardized approach.
Andrea Klein is the Chief Marketing Office of IdenTrust Inc.,
the global leader in trusted identity solutions. She is
responsible for the company’s global strategy, marketing and
business development. Prior to her role at IdenTrust, Andrea was
the Vice President for Financial Services Industry Strategy and
Marketing at Oracle. She has over 25 years of financial industry
experience both from her years at Bank of America and her
experience building and running a global industry marketing and
professional services organization. For article feedback,
contact Andrea at
andrea.klein@identrust.com
|